Eco-Journalist Faces Prosecution
Edited by Charmian By
Cat Lazaroff
BOULDER,
Colorado, July 7, 2000 (ENS) - U.S. Congressman Mark Udall, a Colorado
Democrat, has asked the federal Department of Justice to intervene in the
prosecution of a Colorado reporter arrested for refusing to leave the scene
of an environmental protest. The case points out the problems that journalists
sometimes encounter in accessing sites of conflict between government and
the people it serves.

Reporter
Brian Hansen, kneeling at left, with U.S. Forest Service law-enforcement
officer Chuck Dunfee, just before Hansen's arrest (Photo
by Mark Slupe, courtesy Colorado
Daily)
Brian
Hansen, a reporter for the Boulder based "Colorado Daily," was arrested
on July 6, 1999, while covering a protest at the Vail ski resort, located
on lands leased from the U.S. Forest Service in Colorado. Hansen was charged
with refusing to leave an area that had been closed for reasons of "public
safety," a federal criminal misdemeanor. If convicted, Hansen could be
fined $5,000, or sentenced to six months in jail, or both.
Hansen
says he was just doing his job - reporting the news. The federal government
says Hansen was breaking the law by refusing to leave a federal closure
area.
In
a letter written Wednesday to Robert Rubin, U.S. Assistant Attorney General,
Congressman Udall asks the government to "take a hard look at this case
and determine if its continued prosecution is absolutely necessary for
justice to be properly served."
Udall
stresses that he is not trying to "second guess" the arresting officials
or suggest that the U.S. not take legal action to enforce proper federal
orders. "But I do think that prosecutors, in considering whether to press
a case, should recognize that there is public interest in such events as
this protest," Udall writes, "that members of the press are likely to seek
to cover them, and that a reporter could inadvertently be arrested because
of misunderstandings as to his role and presence at the site."
Hansen’s
arrest may have stemmed from a series of misunderstandings on Hansen’s
part and that of the various federal officials involved in the early morning
raid that led to the arrest of Hansen and six protesters.
A
just-released lynx in the San Juan Mountains west of Creede, Colorado,
part of a reintroduction effort (Photo by Michael
Seraphin courtesy DOW)
Less
than a week earlier, at least 40 activists met on Vail mountain to protest
the expansion of the Vail ski resort within White River National Forest.
The U.S. Forest Service (USFS) approved the Vail construction in 1997.
But several groups, including the Coalition to Stop Vail Expansion, the
Coalition of Forest Defenders, Colorado Wild and Earth First!, say White
River is habitat for endangered lynx, and the construction could lead to
the extinction of the Colorado lynx population.
Protesters
erected a road block on the main construction road and chained themselves
to construction equipment. Activist Joel Lathbury of Earth First! barricaded
himself in an overturned car known as a batmobile with his arm chained
to a block of reinforced cement, also known as a "road dragon," embedded
in the ground beneath the car. The car effectively blocked the only other
official road leading to the construction site, called the Category III
roadless area.
Other
protesters locked themselves to heavy equipment, or to a specially constructed
tripod blocking the loggers’ passage.
At
about 5:00 am July 6, dozens of USFS law enforcement officers, reportedly
in full riot gear, stormed the barricades. Some of the officers were brought
in from the Pacific Northwest region, where the USFS has had more experience
dealing with protesters. Eagle County Sheriff’s Department officers were
also on the scene.

Firefighters
try to extract protester whose arms are locked in sunken concrete on Lime
Creek Road near Vail ski area (Three photos courtesy
Colorado Daily)
Hansen
wanted to remain in the area to monitor official attempts to remove Lathbury
and others at the blockade. He was on assignment for the "Colorado Daily,"
and was displaying his official press credentials.
Federal
officials told Hansen he would have to move about a mile down the mountain
to an area where a public information officer of the USFS would keep him
apprised of developments at the blockade. Hansen refused, pointing out
that he would be unable to report adequately on the events from that distance,
and asserting his rights as a journalist to report the news from the site.
Hansen
did not leave, and was quickly arrested. He was handcuffed and placed on
a bus near the blockade. From the bus, he could see other people moving
about near where he had been arrested. When he asked why those people were
not being arrested, Hansen was told that those people were legally behind
the lines of the official federal closure area. The reporter says no one
ever told him he was so close to that line - and if they had, he would
gladly have moved those few feet to avoid being arrested.
"When
I was taken into custody, I had absolutely no idea that the southern boundary
of the enclosure was apparently just behind me," Hansen told ENS.
Neither
did the two other journalists on the scene - "Colorado Daily" photographer
Mark Slupe and "Vail Daily Trail" reporter Robert Kelly Goss.
Firefighters
work to free Joel Lathbury from the concrete block to which he had chained
himself
"Goss
was physically backed down the mountain, and ended up with nothing to report,
nothing to see," said Hansen. "Goss is much more familiar with the layout,
geography and nomenclature of the roads than I am, but he didn’t get it
either."
Hansen
thinks there is more to his arrest than a simple misunderstanding. Months
after his arrest, he learned of a federal law that requires the notification
of the U.S. attorney general prior to the filing of any criminal charges
against a reporter arrested in the course of covering a story.
On
his own behalf, Hansen has sent requests to the attorney general’s office
and other federal offices looking for evidence that notification had occurred
in his case. In response, after several months of delay, Hansen received
official word that no such documents can be found.
Along
with that response, on May 11 Hansen received a note stating, "for your
further information, the decision to arrest and prosecute you was based
on the fact that you were a protester not that you were a member of the
news media."
Hogwash,
says Hansen. "They knew days, even weeks before the raid that I was a reporter.
There was absolutely no question why I was there. They knew exactly who
I was."

Hansen
has covered environmental issues and other topics for the "Colorado Daily"
for three years
In
fact, Assistant District Attorney Craig Wallace, the attorney charged with
prosecuting Hansen’s case, told the court in evidentiary hearings that
the federal government has no intention of arguing that Hansen was acting
as a protester, and said the government knows full well that Hansen was
there in his role as a journalist.
The
charge against Hansen is just one of violating a federal closure area -
a mechanism used increasingly by the federal government and local police
to keep protesters away from controversial scenes. At the World Trade Organization
meetings in Seattle last November, police set up a 50 square block "no
protest zone," inside of which members of the public were arrested on little
or no provocation. At the meetings of the World Bank and International
Monetary Fund in Washington, DC this April, hundreds of protesters were
arrested after being corralled between police lines during a peaceful protest.
Three time Pulitzer Prize winning photographer Carol Guzy of the "Washington
Post" was among those rounded up.
Just
this morning, the USFS began attempting to remove a six week long road
blockade at the Eagle timber sales in the Mt. Hood National Forest near
Portland, Oregon. The Cascadia Forest Alliance, one of the groups opposing
the timber sales, reports that more than 100 law enforcement officers appeared
on the scene, some in full riot gear and camouflage, to remove about 20
protesters.
The
protesters were blocking access to logging of more than 500 acres of roadless
area within a drinking water watershed. "Removal of the road blockades
is extremely dangerous, putting the lives of peaceful protesters at risk,"
said the Alliance in a statement.
Washington
DC police came prepared with riot gear, gas masks and plastic handcuffs
at the World Bank/IMF meetings in April (Photo ©
Adam Kessel)
The
USFS has put a federal "closure" on a large area of public land around
the road blockades, making it illegal for members of the public to be present.
The courts have sometimes found such closures to be unconstitutional, because
they restrict free speech, freedom of the press and the right to assemble.
When
Hansen and the six protesters arrested at Vail first appeared in court,
an attorney representing Vail Resorts prompted the prosecuting attorney
to ask that all seven defendants be barred from returning to Vail until
they were acquitted. The judge refused, saying that defendants - presumed
innocent until proven guilty - cannot be barred from public lands, including
the National Forest lands on which the Vail resort is expanding.
Hansen,
still handcuffed, could not take notes at his own first court appearance.
Nor were Hansen’s attorney, or the editor of the "Colorado Daily," present
in the courtroom. Both had been told that Hansen would be held overnight,
and would not appear in court until the following day.
Hansen
feels his trial is an attempt by the federal government to shore up the
legality of federal closure areas. If he is convicted, Hansen’s case could
set a precedent allowing federal agencies to bar journalists from such
areas across the country.
He
notes that the federal prosecutor, during evidentiary hearings, repeatedly
questioned Hansen’s ability to remain unbiased in his continuing coverage
of clashes between protesters and federal land managers, including the
ongoing investigation of a 1998 firebombing at Vail.

Hansen
has covered the ongoing investigation of the October 19, 1998 firebombing
that burned the Two Elk Restaurant and seven other sites in Vail, Colorado
(Photo by Mark Mobley)
"I
strongly reject the notion [that I am biased]," said Hansen. "Even if that
was true, and it is not, so what? Doesn’t the First Amendment apply to
people who have opinions?"
The
judge in Hansen’s case seemed to agree. During closing arguments in the
evidentiary hearings on May 25, Federal Magistrate Judge James Robb interrupted
arguments by the federal prosecutor that Hansen was too biased to justify
his presence on the basis of journalism alone, and the court "should forget
the lofty, high-sounding [First Amendment] principles" that Hansen and
his attorney worked to articulate.
"Mr.
Wallace, I'm reminded of Thomas Jefferson," said Judge Robb, "who once
opined that 'Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government
without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate
for a moment to prefer the later.'"
Hansen’s
lawyers have until July 17 to respond to information provided by the federal
prosecutor, after which the judge will rule on Hansen’s motion to have
his case dismissed.
But
more conflicts over the federal government’s right to close off controversial
areas could come soon. Today activists at
Mt. Hood National Forest plan a massive non-violent civil disobedience
protest to defy the closure around the Eagle Creek timber sales.
|